Your location: All | Change location
How do you rate this report?
0
Share it on Facebook  
405Km
Report to Trail: Zoa Peak
Distance: 11Km   Elevation: 635m   High Point: 1875m   Location: Mainland-Southwest, BC, Canada
Trail tags: peak snowshoeing
By    (Reads: 862)
Attempt result and date: Successful attempt 03/06/2010

We went to Zoa on a sunny and very warm day - a forecasted high of 17 degrees! Routefinding was easy using a combination of following roads, following a pipeline right of way, and then following a ridge. There is a scantly-flagged summer trail in the area which we happened across a few times, but following the geography and bearing of the ridge was enough to get us up to the top.

Snow conditions were highly variable - we encountered slushy, water-saturated snow in the morning on the south-facing ridge slopes, then powder, then thick hoarfrost coating every surface, and finally an icy crust towards the end of the day as we descended over formerly slushy slopes. The slushy stuff in the morning made ascending rather difficult in some places - I was glad I had brought my snowshoe tails for extra flotation.

At the Zoa summit we heard the snowpack whumph twice - kind of alarming given the low avalanche forecast. The snowpack seems to be melting rapidly as well - there were a few areas on the pipeline right-of-way which had melted to the ground. Most other places it seems to be about 1 to 2 meters deep.

The payoff is very nice in winter. The upper parts of the ridge are generally very open, with excellent views of the surrounding mountains. Even better, once you get to this area the terrain flattens out making for easy strolling.
 
Yak Peak, from the northeast.
The location of this trailGeotagged photoNearby trails. The color indicates the status of their last attempt.

Login to add your comment
490Km
at 10am 03/08/2010
The only section to be wary of is col before the final ascent to (and descent from) Zoa Peak. The terrain slopes in such a way that a slide would end up in a gulley. Zoom in on the map and go back and forth between the Terrain and Satellite settings and you'll see it. It's off to the left of me and Maria in pic #9.
405Km
at 10am 03/08/2010
We didn't do any tests other than digging down a bit into the snowpack to see what was up. The terrain is considered "challenging" (the middle rating) by the CAA, though that is a rating for backcountry skiing. We were avoiding most of the slopes that were attractive to skiers (i.e. the steeper ones.) If I were to give it a snowshoe rating, I would call it simple terrain as long as you stay on the ridgetop - you could always see, well in advance, the slopes you would have to cross or ascend.
709Km
at 9am 03/08/2010
Did you do any avalanche probing? Is this area considered risky "terrain-wise" normally?
Successful attempt 06/15/2009
Pretty Easy trail. Largely covered in snow, but not   more...
  Reads:390
 
Successful attempt 08/15/2010
 happy
Susanne, Rich, Hiromi, Adriana and I woke up early   more...
  Photo votes:2   Reads:260
 
Successful attempt 04/25/2010
 excited
In a great group, even a long and demanding 13-hour   more...
  Photo votes:24   Votes:2   Reads:1634
 
Failed attempt 07/10/2010
 adventurous
This trip was great fun and comes in three distinct   more...
  Comments:2   Photo votes:8   Votes:1   Reads:766
 
Successful attempt 07/24/2010
 excited
Of the hikes outlined in "103 Hikes" I think Needle   more...
  Photo votes:3   Votes:1   Reads:590
Successful attempt 08/28/2010
 happy
Many things surprised me about this hike. -it was   more...
  Reads:31
 
Successful attempt 07/05/2009
There wasn't much snow on Yak's basin and there was   more...
  Photo votes:6   Votes:1   Reads:880
Failed attempt 04/25/2010
 excited
With 30 cm of fresh snow in the last 48 hours, this   more...
  Comments:4   Photo votes:20   Votes:4   Reads:828
Have your done this trail recently?
Post your report
Green Pledges
Add a pledge you plan to do to save our planet. Learn More
All trail reports and information are submitted by users like you. Live Trails takes no responsibility for their accuracy.